Assessments

Under the Children Act 1989, local authorities undertake assessments of the needs of individual children to determine what services to provide and action to take:

• A Child in Need is defined under the Children Act 1989 as a child who is unlikely to achieve or maintain a satisfactory level of health or development, or their health and development will be significantly impaired, without the provision of services; or a child who is disabled. In these cases, assessments by a social worker are carried out under Section 17 of the Children Act 1989. Children in Need may be assessed under Section 17 of the Children Act 1989, in relation to their Special Educational Needs, disabilities, or as a carer, or because they have committed a crime. The process for assessment should also be used for children whose parents are in prison and for unaccompanied migrant children and child victims of modern slavery. When assessing Children in Need and providing services, specialist assessments may be required and, where possible, should be coordinated so that the child and family experience a coherent process and a single plan of action.
  
  The need to assess can also include pre-birth situations when a mother's own circumstances would give cause for concern that the pre-birth, and then born, child would come within the definition of being a 'Child in Need' (see Section 14, Pre-birth 'Good Practice Steps');

• Concerns about maltreatment may be the reason for a Referral to local authority children's social care or concerns may arise during the course of providing services to the child and family. In these circumstances, local authority children's social care must initiate enquiries to find out what is happening to the child and whether protective action is required. Local authorities, with the help of other organisations as appropriate, also have a duty to make enquiries under Section 47 of the Children Act 1989 if they have reasonable cause to suspect that a child is suffering, or is likely to suffer, Significant Harm, to enable them to decide whether they should take any action to safeguard and promote the child's welfare. Such enquiries, supported by other organisations and agencies as appropriate, should be initiated where there are concerns about all forms of abuse and neglect. This includes female genital mutilation and other honour-based violence, and extra-familial threats including radicalisation and sexual or criminal exploitation;
• There may be a need for immediate protection whilst the Assessment is carried out;
• Some Children in Need may require accommodation because there is no one who has Parental Responsibility for them, or because they are alone or abandoned. Under Section 20 of the Children Act 1989, the local authority has a duty to accommodate such Children in Need in their area. Following an application under Section 31A, where a child is the subject of a Care Order, the local authority, as a corporate parent, must assess the child's needs and draw up a Care Plan which sets out the services which will be provided to meet the child's identified needs.

The assessment should be led by a qualified social worker supervised by a qualified social work manager.

The purpose of the assessment is always:

• To gather important information about a child and family;
• To analyse their needs and/or the nature and level of any risk and harm being suffered by the child; including where the harm or risk of harm is from outside the home;
• To decide whether the child is a Child in Need (Section 17) and/or is suffering or likely to suffer Significant Harm (Section 47); and
• Identify support from within the family network;
• To provide support to address those needs to improve the child's outcomes and welfare and, where necessary, to make them safe;
• Assessments for some children will require particular care. This is especially so for:
  • Young carers;
  • Children with special educational needs (including to inform and be informed by Education, Health and Care Plans) (see also Children and Young People Aged 0-25 With Special Educational Needs and Disabilities Procedure);
  • Unborn children where there are concerns regarding the parent(s);
  • Children in hospital;
  • Children with specific communication needs;
  • Unaccompanied migrant children (see also Unaccompanied Migrant Children and Child Victims of Trafficking and Modern Slavery Procedure);
  • Children considered at risk of gang activity and association with organised crime groups;
  • Children at risk of female genital mutilation;
  • Children who are in the youth justice system see also Children in Our Care and Young People in Contact with Youth Justice Services Procedure; and
  • Children returning home following a period of Accommodation.
• Every assessment must be informed by the views of the child as well as the family, and a child's wishes and feelings must be sought regarding the provision of services to be delivered.

The assessment will involve drawing together and analysing available information from a range of sources, including existing records, and involving and obtaining relevant information from professionals in relevant agencies and others in contact with the child and family. Where an Early Help Assessment has already been completed this information should be used to inform the assessment. The child and family's history should be understood.

Where a child is involved in other assessment processes, these must be coordinated so that the child does not become lost between the different agencies involved and their different procedures. All plans for the child developed by the various agencies and individual professionals should be joined up so that the child and family experience a single assessment and planning process, which shares a focus on the outcomes for the child.

The social worker should analyse all the information gathered from the enquiry stage of the assessment to decide the nature and level of the child's needs and the level of risk, if any, they may be facing. Practitioners should have access to high-quality supervision from a Practice Supervisor who will help challenge their assumptions as part of this process.

Practitioners play a crucial role in assessing and planning care for individuals. While it is important to maintain a positive outlook and hope for adults to overcome their challenges, this should not compromise the safety and wellbeing of children. Practitioners should stay informed by the latest research on the impact of abuse, neglect, and exploitation. Additionally, insights from serious case and practice reviews should guide their assessment of the child’s level of need and risk.

All of this information should be reflected in the case records.

Critical reflection through supervision should strengthen the analysis in each assessment. An informed decision should be taken on the nature of any action required and which services should be provided. Social workers, their managers and other professionals should be mindful of the requirement to understand the level of need and risk in a family from the child's perspective and ensure action or commission services which will have the maximum positive impact on the child's life. Where there is a conflict of interest, decisions should be made in the child's best interests, be rooted in child development, be age-appropriate, and be informed by evidence.

When new information comes to light or circumstances change the child's needs, any previous conclusions should be updated and critically reviewed to ensure that the child is not overlooked as noted in many lessons from serious case and practice reviews.

An assessment should establish:

• The nature of the concern and the impact this has had on the child;
• An analysis of their needs and/or the nature and level of any risk and harm being suffered by the child;
• How and why the concerns have arisen;
• What the child's and the family's needs appear to be and whether the child is a Child in Need;
• Whether the concern involves abuse or Neglect; and
• Whether there is any need for any urgent action to protect the child, or any other children in the household or community.

Research has demonstrated that taking a systematic approach to assessments using a conceptual model is the best way to deliver a comprehensive analysis. A good assessment is one which investigates the three domains set out in the Assessment Framework Triangle (see Section 11, Developing a Clear Analysis). The interaction of these domains requires careful investigation during the assessment.

The assessment will involve drawing together and analysing available information from a range of sources, including existing records, and involving and obtaining relevant information from professionals in relevant agencies and others in contact with the child and family. Where a Family Wellbeing Assessment has already been completed this information should be used to inform the assessment. The child and family's history should be understood.

Where a child is involved in other assessment processes, it is important that these are coordinated so that the child does not become lost between the different agencies involved and their different procedures. All plans for the child developed by the various agencies and individual professionals should be joined up so that the child and family experience a single assessment and planning process, which shares a focus on the outcomes for the child.

See also: Section 18, Assessment of Risk Outside the Home.

An assessment for Early Help can be undertaken by a Lead Practitioner who is not necessarily a qualified social worker.

Assessments for Early Help should consider how the needs of different family members impact on each other. This includes needs relating to education, mental and physical health, financial stability housing, substance use and crime. Specific needs should be considered such as disabilities, those whose 1st language isn’t English, fathers or male carers, and parents who identify as LGBTQ+. Early Help services may focus on improving family functioning and developing the family’s capacity to establish positive routines and solve problems. Where family networks support the child and parents, services may take an approach that enables family group decision-making, such as a family group conference.

The safeguarding partnership publishes a threshold document (trix link) which sets out the criteria for early help.

In the case of child protection enquiries (section 47 Children Act 1989), Tthe assessment should be led by a qualified and experienced social worker with the appropriate skills, knowledge and capacity to carry out the assessment. The practitioner must be regularly supervised by a social work manager. Principal social workers should support Practitioners, the local authority and partners to develop their assessment practice and decision-making skills, and the practice methodology that underpins this.

The date of the commencement of the assessment will be recorded in the electronic database.

The qualified social worker should carefully plan that the following are carried out:

• See/interview the child;
• Interview the parents and any other relevant family members;
• Consider whether to see the child with their parents;
• The child should be seen by the lead social worker without their caregivers when appropriate and this should be recorded in the Assessment Record;
• Determine what the parents should be told of any concerns;
• Consult with, and consider contributions from, all relevant agencies, including agencies covering previous addresses in the UK and abroad.

If it is determined that a child should not be seen as part of the assessment, this should be recorded by the manager with an explanation for this decision.

Before a Referral is discussed with other agencies, the parent's consent should usually be sought, unless doing so may place the child at risk of Significant Harm, in which case the manager should authorise the discussion of the Referral with other agencies without parental knowledge or consent. The authorisation should be recorded with reasons.

If during, the course of the assessment, it is discovered that a school-age child is not attending an educational establishment, the social worker should contact the local education service to establish a reason for this.

If there is suspicion that a crime may have been committed including sexual or physical assault or neglect of the child, the Police must be notified immediately.

The timing of an assessment following a child’s case referral to Children’s Social Care should align with the child’s specific needs and the level of risk they face. Qualified Practice Supervisors or managers must make individual judgments for each case. Similarly, assessments of adult parent/carers or non-parent carers, should also be conducted promptly.

The qualified social worker should carefully plan that the following are carried out and consider that the referral may include siblings or a single child within a sibling group. (Where the initial focus for a referral is on one child, other children in the household or family should be equally considered, and the individual circumstances of each assessed and evaluated separately):

• See/interview the child;
• Interview the parents and any other relevant family members;
• Consider whether to see the child with the parents;
• The child should be seen by the lead social worker without their caregivers when appropriate and this should be recorded in the assessment Record;
• Determine what the parents should be told of any concerns;
• Consult with and consider contributions from all relevant agencies, including agencies covering previous addresses in the UK and abroad.

If it is determined that a child should not be seen as part of the assessment, this should be recorded by the manager with an explanation for this decision.

Questions to be considered in planning assessments include:

• Who will undertake the assessment and what resources will be needed?
• Who in the family will be included and how will they be involved (including absent or wider family and others significant to the child)?
• In what grouping will the child and family members be seen and in what order and where?
• What services are to be provided during the assessment?
• Are there communication needs? If so, what are the specific needs and how they will be met?
• How will the assessment take into account the particular issues faced by black and minority ethnic children and their families, and disabled children and their families?
• What method of collecting information will be used? Are there any tools / questionnaires available?
• What information is already available?
• What other sources of knowledge about the child and family are available and how will other agencies and professionals who know the family be informed and involved?
• How will the consent of family members be obtained?
• What will be the timescales?
• How will the information be recorded?
• How will it be analysed and who will be involved?
• When will the outcomes be discussed and service planning take place.

In planning the assessment the person undertaking the assessment will need to consider and address any communication issues, for example language or impairment. Where a child or parent speaks a language other than that spoken by the practitioner, an interpreter should be provided. Any decision not to use an interpreter in such circumstances must be approved by the Team Manager and recorded.

Where a child or parent with disabilities has communication difficulties it may be necessary to use alternatives to speech. In communicating with a child with such an impairment, it may be particularly useful to involve a person who knows the child well and is familiar with the child's communication methods. However, caution should be given in using family members to facilitate communication. Where the child has had a communication assessment, its conclusions and recommendations should be observed.

Children should be actively involved in all parts of the process based upon their age, developmental stage and identity. Direct work with the child and family should include observations of the interactions between the child and the parents/care givers. They should be seen alone and if this is not possible or in their best interest, the reason should be recorded.

The pace of the assessment needs to acknowledge the pace at which the child can contribute. However, this should not be a reason for delay in taking protective action. It is important to understand the resilience of the individual child in their family and community context when planning appropriate services.

Every assessment should be child centred. Where there is a conflict between the needs of the child and their parents/carers, decisions should be made in the child's best interests.

A good assessment will paint a picture of what the life is like for the child and clearly reflect the child's experience.

All agencies and professionals involved with the child, and the family, have a responsibility to contribute to the assessment process. This might take the form of providing information in a timely manner and direct or joint work. Differences of opinion between professionals should be resolved speedily but where this is not possible, the local arrangements for resolving professional disagreements should be implemented.

It is possible that professionals have different experiences of the child and family and understanding these differences will actively contribute to the understanding of the child / family.

The professionals should be involved from the outset and through the agreed, regular process of review.

Agencies providing services to adults, who are parents, carers or who have regular family time with children must consider the impact on the child of the particular needs of the adult in question.

Bexley has adopted the Signs of Safety model of assessment and planning. The assessment record refers to the 7 domains to assist with the analysis of information:

Child-centred assessments should clearly articulate the child’s perspective and reflect the lived experience of the child. Decisions should be made with the child’s best interests in mind, considering their developmental stage, age-appropriateness, and sensitivity to adversity and trauma.

Observations play a crucial role, especially for babies, infants, and non-verbal children. When assessing disabled children, practitioners should assess the need for specialised communication support and explore how advocacy services can facilitate the child’s communication of their views.

Research has demonstrated that taking a systematic approach to assessments using a conceptual model is the best way to deliver a comprehensive analysis. A good assessment is one which investigates the three domains set out in the Assessment Framework Triangle.

Analysis is the weighing up of all information gathered to understand what has been/is happening to the child, how harmful that has been and predicting the probability/likelihood of it continuing or happening again. The following are questions to guide practitioners in the systematic analysis of information gathered during the assessment process. The following questions can assist to develop a clear analysis:

What is working well?

• What are the strengths and best attributes of the parenting;
• What are the safety factors in this child's life? (Safety is when strengths are demonstrated as protection over time).

What are we worried about?

• What is the identified harm or potential harm (danger) to the child? Separate the issues e.g. DV, drug misuse, emotional abuse, mental health difficulties;
• In order to predict the likelihood (risk) of future harm or change, an analysis of what has been happening in the past and what is happening in the present needs to occur;
• To judge 'significance' consider: What is the duration? How long has this been going on for? How frequently is it happening/has is happened? What is the context in which this happens/has happened? How serious is/was the incident/s or situation? Low, moderate, high;
• If the child has been harmed or at risk of harm, what is the harm attributable to? (a) the parenting/parents behaviour (b) the family environment (c) the child is beyond parental control;
• What has been or will be the impact on the child's health and wellbeing in the immediate, medium and long term?
• If there a number of concerns, is there a correlation, how do they compound each other?
• How have the parents responded to the concerns that have been raised? E.g. Have they shown insight into the concerns? Do they recognise why there is a concern? Do they agree? Do they accept responsibility for it? Have they been able to offer alternatives? How able are the parents/carers to manage the risk factors themselves?
• What is the level of engagement from the parents? E.g. How have they behaved & what is their level of co-operation or resistance? When considering the parents behaviour, is there a genuine commitment to change, compliance with requirements, disguised compliance and/or overt non-engagement;
• Has professional intervention thus far made any difference? Has anything changed in relation to (1) the child's experience (2) the parenting being given. What is it? If nothing has changed yet;
• What is parent's ability & motivation (capacity) to change, what is the likelihood of change in the future? How quickly is that change likely to occur and is this soon enough for the child?
• If change has been achieved in the present what is the likelihood of change being sustained when professionals are not present? Being clear about what level of engagement helps to predict this. If there is genuine commitment, the likelihood of maintenance is higher than if you only have compliant behaviour;
• What might be triggers for relapse? If some change has been achieved in the present, what might cause the situation to return as before? E.g. The return of an abusive partner triggering a return to alcohol misuse;
• What are the sources of evidence for this and how reliable are the information sources?
• What don't we know about this child & family, how crucial is this missing information, can a robust analysis be made without it?
• Once these issues have been weighed up, predict 'on a balance of probability' the likelihood of the concerns continuing or re-emerging in the future and what factors are likely to increase the risk of harm (danger)?

When new information comes to light or circumstances change the child's needs, any previous conclusions should be updated and critically reviewed to ensure that the child is not overlooked as noted in many lessons from Serious Case Reviews.

Every assessment should end with a clear set of outcomes and next steps for how to achieve the outcomes. Deciding if services are required and if so, which services and support to provide to deliver improved welfare for the child. The assessment should determine:

• Is this a Child in Need? (Section 17 Children Act 1989);
• Is there reasonable cause to suspect that this child is suffering, or is likely to suffer, Significant Harm? (Section 47 Children Act 1989);
• Is this a child in need of accommodation? (Section 20 or Section 31A Children Act 1989).

The possible outcomes of the assessment should be decided on by the social worker and their line manager, who should agree a plan of action setting out the services to be delivered how and by whom in discussion with the child and family and the professionals involved.

The outcomes may be as follows:

• No further action;
• Additional support which can be provided through universal services and single service provision; early help services;
• The development of a multi-agency child in need plan for the provision of child in need services to promote the child's health and development;
• Undertaking a Strategy Discussion/Meeting, to consider whether a Section 47 child protection enquiry is required;
• Emergency action to protect a child.

The conclusions of the assessment should be:

• Discussed with the child and family and provided to them in written form. Exceptions to this are where this might place a child at risk of harm or jeopardise an enquiry;
• Taking account of confidentiality, provided to professional referrers;
• Given in writing to agencies involved in providing services to the child with the action points, review dates and intended outcomes for the child stated.

In a High Court judgment (Nottingham City Council v LW & Ors [2016] EWHC 11(Fam) (19 February 2016)) Keehan J set out five points of basic good practice steps with respect to public law proceedings regarding pre-birth and newly born children and particularly where Children's Services are aware at a relatively early stage of the pregnancy.

In respect of assessment, these were:

• A risk assessment of the parent(s) should 'commence immediately upon the social workers being made aware of the mother's pregnancy';
• Any assessment should be completed at least 4 weeks before the mother's expected delivery date;
• The assessment should be updated to take into account relevant events pre - and post delivery where these events could affect an initial conclusion in respect of risk and care planning of the child;
• The assessment should be disclosed upon initial completion to the parents and, if instructed, to their solicitor to give them the opportunity to challenge the Care Plan and risk assessment.

(See Care and Supervision Proceedings and the Public Law Outline Procedure, Pre-Birth, Newborns and Infants).

Where a 16 or 17 year old seeks help from local authority children's services, or is referred to children's services by some other person or agency as appearing to be homeless or threatened with homelessness, children's services must carry out an assessment of what duties, if any, are owed to them. This includes 17 year olds who are approaching their 18th birthday, and young people who are pregnant or have children in their care.

If there is an imminent threat of homelessness, or if the young person is actually homeless, a child in need assessment must be carried out and the child accommodated under section 20 Children Act 1989, (although this can be refused by the child) (see Prevention of Homelessness and Provision of Accommodation for 16 and 17 year olds who may be Homeless and/or require Accommodation; and Duty to Refer).

Intentional Homelessness see: Homelessness Guidance for local authorities.

The assessment plan must set out timescales for the actions to be met and stages of the assessment to progress, which should include regular points to review the assessment. The work with the child and family should ensure that the agreed points are achieved through regular reviews. Where delays or obstacles occur these must be acted on and the assessment plan must be reviewed if any circumstances change for the child.

The social worker's line manager must review the assessment plan regularly with the social worker and ensure that actions such as those below have been met:

• There has been direct communication with the child alone and their views and wishes have been recorded and taken into account when providing services;
• All the children in the household have been seen and their needs considered;
• The child's home address has been visited and the child's bedroom has been seen;
• The parents have been seen and their views and wishes have been recorded and taken into account;
• The analysis and evaluation have been completed;
• The assessment provides clear evidence for decisions on what types of services are needed to provide good outcomes for the child and family.

An increasing number of cases involve families from abroad, necessitating assessments of family members in other countries. However, the Court of Appeal has pointed out that it might not be professional, permissible or lawful for a social worker to undertake an assessment in another jurisdiction. CFAB advise that enquiries should be made as to whether the assessment can be undertaken by the authorities in the overseas jurisdiction. UK social workers should not routinely travel overseas to undertake assessments in countries where they have no knowledge of legislative frameworks, cultural expectations or resources available to a child placed there.

See also: Cross-border child protection cases: the 1996 Hague Convention (DfE) and The International Child Abduction and Contact Unit.

As well as threats to the welfare of children from within their families, children may be vulnerable to abuse or exploitation from outside their families. These extra-familial threats might arise at school and other educational establishments, from within peer groups, or more widely from within the wider community and/or online.

As well as threats to the welfare of children from within their families, children may be vulnerable to abuse or exploitation from outside their families. This is often referred to as extra-familial harm. These extra-familial threats might arise at school and other educational establishments, from within peer groups, or more widely from within the wider community and/or online.

Children may experience this type of harm from other children and/or from adults. Forms of extra-familial harm include exploitation by criminal and organised crime groups and individuals (such as county lines and financial exploitation), serious violence, modern slavery and trafficking, online harm, sexual exploitation, teenage relationship abuse, and the influences of extremism which could lead to radicalisation. Children of all ages can experience extra-familial harm.

Where children may be experiencing extra-familial harm, children’s social care assessments should determine whether a child is in need under section 17 or section 47 of the Children Act 1989.

Assessments of children in such cases should consider whether wider environmental factors are undermining effective intervention being undertaken to reduce risk with the child and family. Parents and carers have little influence over the contexts in which the abuse takes place and the young person's experiences of this extra-familial abuse can undermine parent-child relationships.

A good assessment should:

• Build an understanding of the child’s strengths, interests, identity, and culture;
• Respond to each of the vulnerabilities and/or challenges that the child may be facing, including any within the home;
• Gather information on past experiences of trauma and how this may impact on the child’s current experience of harm and on how they interact with practitioners;
• Explore how the child's experiences within their families and networks, including their friends and peer groups, interplay with the risk of harm outside of the home and identify what needs to change;
• Support parents, carers, and family networks to understand what is happening to the child, working with them to ensure they can best meet the child’s needs and play an active part in the solutions and processes to help create safety for the child;
• Understand the risk of extra-familial harm for siblings, for example, where older children are exploited, younger siblings may also be at risk of being targeted.

Within this context, children who may be alleged perpetrators should also be assessed to understand the impact of contextual issues on their safety and welfare.

Assessments of children in such cases should consider the individual needs and vulnerabilities of each child. They should look at the parental capacity to support the child, including helping the parents and carers to understand any risks and support them to keep children safe and assess potential risk to the child.

These interventions should focus on addressing both child and family and these wider environmental factors, which are likely to be a threat to the safety and welfare of a number of different children who may or may not be known to local authority Children's Social Care.